The senior manager calls first. Which ticket takes priority?
Use service impact and a tested workaround, not job title or ticket volume alone.
The question
Bellmere is a fictional healthcare group with clinics, offices and a supply warehouse. The ticket, policy and technical evidence below are original practice material, not an employer’s actual interview question.
| Affected staff | Work status | |
|---|---|---|
| Senior manager’s office printer | 1 | Approved alternate printer tested and working |
| Shared clinic check-in desk | 6 | Registration work stopped; alternate desk not yet tested |
Fictional healthcare IT support. This is service prioritization, not clinical triage or medical advice.
- Priority
- Prioritize active service interruption by impact and urgency. A verified workaround can reduce urgency. Seniority alone does not change priority.
- Authority
- The service desk may collect impact evidence and notify the duty IT coordinator. It cannot declare patient-care outcomes or change clinical procedures.
- Immediate need
- The clinic coordinator needs a clear IT owner and next update. A clinical service lead owns any clinical continuity decision.
“Choose the first support action and explain it to both callers.”
Not saved by this site. Your browser may restore text when you navigate back.
A strong answer, step by step
Open each step in turn. This is one strong answer, not the only one.
Step 1: Apply the supplied priority rule
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Prioritize the senior manager because the call arrived first
Tempting, but it misses something. The rule uses current impact and urgency, not title or arrival order alone.
Prioritize the check-in interruption
The strong move. Current service impact and workaround state matter more than seniority.
See how a strong candidate says it
“The manager has a working alternate printer. Six clinic staff have stopped registration work with no verified workaround. I would prioritize the shared check-in interruption under the supplied rule.”
Why it works: Current service impact and workaround state matter more than seniority.
Step 2: Check the impact without inventing harm
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Confirm scope and test the approved alternate route
The strong move. Service interruption is verified; clinical consequences are not.
Describe it as a patient-safety incident to get faster attention
Tempting, but it misses something. That asserts a clinical consequence not established by the supplied facts.
See how a strong candidate says it
“I would confirm which desks, functions and start time are affected, and whether the approved alternate desk works. I would not claim a patient-safety incident from this packet.”
Why it works: Service interruption is verified; clinical consequences are not.
Step 3: Bring in the correct owners
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Tell staff to use an improvised paper process immediately
Tempting, but it misses something. The supplied rule reserves clinical continuity decisions to the clinical service lead.
Notify the IT coordinator and preserve clinical authority
The strong move. Technical support and clinical authority remain separate.
See how a strong candidate says it
“I would notify the duty IT coordinator with the interruption evidence. The clinical service lead decides clinical continuity measures; support does not invent a clinical workaround.”
Why it works: Technical support and clinical authority remain separate.
Step 4: Keep both callers informed
What would you do here? Open the move you’d make.
Leave the printer ticket without a reply until the clinic is fixed
Tempting, but it misses something. The manager still needs confirmation of the workaround and a clear expectation.
Give both callers an owner or next update
The strong move. Priority changes work order, not the duty to communicate.
See how a strong candidate says it
“I would tell the manager that the tested alternate printer is available and give a return update. For the clinic, I would name the IT owner and the next update, even if diagnosis is still in progress.”
Why it works: Priority changes work order, not the duty to communicate.
The answer, in short
- Decision
- Prioritize the shared check-in interruption and verify its scope and workaround state.
- Because
- Six staff are blocked while the printer caller has a tested alternative; the supplied rule uses impact and urgency.
- What would change it
- A working approved check-in alternative, wider impact or changed urgency could change the order. Clinical consequences require the clinical owner’s assessment.
Common traps
- Letting seniority replace the supplied priority rule.
- Inventing clinical harm or a clinical workaround.
Check your answer
- Did you compare six blocked staff with one caller’s tested workaround?
- Did you check the unknown scope and alternate desk?
- Did you leave clinical decisions with the clinical lead?
- Did you give both callers a useful update?
Last reviewed Nov 10, 2026